Email Updates :


The Filmmaker Q&A Page is dedicated to answering questions emailed to Paul Sampson.


Question: I know writing a script involving historic events can be complicated, but as an independent film maker, was it difficult to develop the middle ages filming of the movie because most independent productions I’ve seen are really just contemporary talking head films?


Sampson's Answer: I have a dozen scripts and this is by far the most ‘complex’ one of them all. You are correct in noting that ‘developing’ scripts involving any type of period piece or historical elements does complicate matters.

The pre-production of the Medieval segment of this movie was very difficult. There are many reasons why almost all Indy filmmaker’s stay away from making demanding period piece projects…especially ones with knights, horses and chain mail… many reasons. And I’m quite sure that I now know them all.

It was by far the longest pre-production of any movie I’ve been involved in, especially on the Indy level. And I’m NOT talking about pre-production as in securing financing or script re-writes, or trying to get an actor. No, I’m talking about actual pre-production. For example, Medieval costume research, design and making (thank you Sandra); weaponry research, design, purchasing, and believe it or not, making…yep, I made most of the shields by hand from raw metal…I’m not kidding. In addition, there were so many other things you wouldn’t think of that go into a movie as diverse as this, which involves Medieval times. When a studio makes a period piece they have hundreds of people doing pre-production, For the most part, I had myself, and fortunately, at times, the generous help of less than a handful of now lifelong friends. It made it special for me when it came time to shoot after putting in so much effort for the pre production, and I’m referring to the Medieval shoot, more so.



Question: I saw the movie’s crew and actor credit list. It looks like a really big budget movie. What was the budget? Was it financed by a studio, and if so, which one? Did you shoot the movie all at once or in sections?


Sampson's Answer: First off, I don’t want to talk about actual budget figures. However I will address your other questions. No, it wasn’t financed by a studio. The money was raised outside the system and it wasn’t cheap. I wanted to be able to control the creative end of the movie and that forced me to raise the money on my own. There were several times that money was offered to me but it came with a creative price, so I kept it independent.

Regarding your question about the actual shoot…or I should say shoots, well, it was extremely outlandish for an Indy Film. Not including the pre and post production, which were both very lengthy in their own right, the actual shooting length of the movie spanned over a 2 ½ year time period. And during these shoots, there were three (3) full and completely different production crews, which included 4 different camera operators and 5 A.D.’s. Furthermore, two (2) very distinct sets of actors worked on the film in order to cover the film’s 700 year time span… and that’s not even counting the hundreds of people involved in 2nd units. So yes, it was a lot of crew and cast, bigger than any movie (studio or independent) that I’ve personally been involved in. Maybe after this I’ll get to play around (act) in one of those 100 – 200 million dollar projects. But no, my movie wasn’t a studio financed project... one might pick it up when it’s time to sell it, but that would obviously be after the fact. Let’s just leave it as this project was very taxing for me to make on every possible level. But it’ll be an accomplishment that I’ll remember… perhaps in a haunting way (laughing).


Question: You shot different time periods. I read in the synopsis that all the characters are ‘re-animated’ spirits from the past. Was it difficult for everyone involved to keep track of who and what they were supposed to be and how they should act in the future to match their old selves or new selves? It must have made it difficult for the actors to act accordingly; did the old and new counter parts spend time together to get to know each other? Did the crew have to take special notes to make things match from the past or so that they would match the future?


Sampson's Answer: All great questions, however, none really apply. Here’s the kicker… other than myself, No one ever saw the full script. And when I say ‘no one’ I mean NO ONE. As I mentioned in my answer to another question, there were 3 different and complete film crews along with two different sets of actors (Medieval and modern cast). I didn’t show any one of them the complete script…ever!

I felt that it would all fit together in the end because of the story telling and dialogue of the script…which only I had. I truly believed that all everyone needed to do was focus on their surroundings, their moment in time, especially the actors. I didn’t want them to know who they were in the past or would be in the future as far as their characters were concerned. They only needed to know what their character would know in their lifetime. This way their delivery would be organic. I wanted nothing anticipated, overly configured or certain dialogue unnaturally emphasized. And if an actor got off course, I’d lead them back in the right direction. It worked out perfectly in the end…yes, my plan of world denomination is all coming together now (hahahahaha).

Besides the post house personnel, it’s safe to say that 100% of them (cast and crew) have no clue as to what the story/plot of the film is totally about and that they’ll all be in shock when they see the final project, more so, say, in comparison to other projects they’ll ever work on in their careers as actors and crew members.



Question: Your crew list credits two different people as the “Director of Photography.” Why? Were they partners or part of a team of photographers? I’ve never seen two listed on a film before, did one instruct and the other shoot. But if that’s the case, wouldn’t you list one as the Director of Photography and the other as “Camera Operator?”


Sampson's Answer: They worked exclusively from one another. I wanted to differentiate the look and overall emotion of the Modern Day part of my film from that of the Medieval segments, so I hired very distinct D.P.s that had extremely different shooting styles. One was old school, a basic stick and dolly kind of guy. He was perfect for the Medieval sections. He gave it that story book feel I envisioned, like a film version of Henry V. The other was a lot younger, loved throwing hand held/steadicam in the mix, he was the man I needed for the Modern Day shoot.

And no, they weren’t a part of a team. That’s funny. Truthfully, to date, they’ve never spoken or met each other. No correspondence whatsoever. Like the actors, I didn’t want them to influence each other’s style. In the movie, including the D.P.s, there were a total of four (4) camera operators who shot during the filming of the movie. Each one had their specialty.


Question: The IMDB listed the shooting format of the movie as film. Why didn’t you shoot on video? Didn’t your producers want you to shoot on video to save money?

Sampson's Answer: I wouldn’t shoot on video, not this one, it had to be film. I even went with a certain FUJI film stock for one time period of the movie and a particular KODAK stock for the other, just for the distinction the two have in their colour saturations. It’s about the details. Details probably no one will notice (other than myself) … with the exception perhaps of some die hard film purists and a handful of freakish recluse artists (with OCD, of course) living in basements in places like Paris and Helsinki. Maybe I’ll get lucky and the audience will notice subconsciously.

As far as your asking if the producer pushed to shoot on video to save money, well, I was the producer…so there was no argument there. However, when talking to a “Hollywood Producer” and asked why I switched film stocks for the other period of the movie I tell them that I found a cheaper film stock so I switched. They like that reason much more.

Seriously, if I hadn’t produced the project myself, it would have ended up being shot on video. And every detail and exactness that I executed from the types of horses I used to the authentic costuming to the automobiles and songs used in the film would have been diminished to crap. That’s the reality of it all. I knew I had to produce it myself, the first one anyway. I had to get at least one in the right way, the way I wanted, without corruption from the "suits." Someone else can finance the next project I’m involved in, I did what I needed to do on this one.



To Reach Paul Sampson by direct email:
   
Email: paulsampson@hotmail.com
   
IMDB Pages: Paul Sampson's IMDB Page
  Night of the Templar IMDB Page
   
   
 
© 2011 Sampson Enterprises